DocumentCode :
148512
Title :
What should they learn? A short comparison between different areas of competence and accreditation boards´ criteria for engineering education
Author :
May, Dominik ; Terkowsky, Claudius
Author_Institution :
Center for Higher Educ., Tech. Univ. Dortmund Univ., Dortmund, Germany
fYear :
2014
fDate :
3-5 April 2014
Firstpage :
1046
Lastpage :
1050
Abstract :
The question “What should engineering students learn for being successful engineers?” is and always was a driver for intense discussions about curriculum development in engineering education. Contributions to this question differ between various types of education institutions and organizations, various fields of specialization, and even various countries. Such differences make it necessary, that a framework, which describes the students´ intended learning outcomes in engineering education programs, must be designed openly to represent engineering education in general and in the same way accurately enough to answer the question above. Therefore this work-in-progress-paper firstly discusses a general model of areas of competence, secondly looks at different accreditation boards´ criteria for engineering education, thirdly combines the boards´ criteria with the general areas of competences and fourthly derives conclusions for engineering education in laboratories.
Keywords :
accreditation; engineering education; accreditation board criteria; competence board criteria; curriculum development; education institutions; educationorganizations; engineering education programs; Accreditation; Context; Educational institutions; Engineering education; Industries; Laboratories; accreditation board; areas of competence; curriculum development; engineering education; framework; laboratories; learning outcomes;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2014 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Istanbul
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826235
Filename :
6826235
Link To Document :
بازگشت