• DocumentCode
    1498091
  • Title

    Regularization Parameter Selection for Nonlinear Iterative Image Restoration and MRI Reconstruction Using GCV and SURE-Based Methods

  • Author

    Ramani, S. ; Zhihao Liu ; Rosen, J. ; Nielsen, Jakob ; Fessler, J.A.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Volume
    21
  • Issue
    8
  • fYear
    2012
  • Firstpage
    3659
  • Lastpage
    3672
  • Abstract
    Regularized iterative reconstruction algorithms for imaging inverse problems require selection of appropriate regularization parameter values. We focus on the challenging problem of tuning regularization parameters for nonlinear algorithms for the case of additive (possibly complex) Gaussian noise. Generalized cross-validation (GCV) and (weighted) mean-squared error (MSE) approaches [based on Stein´s unbiased risk estimate (SURE)] need the Jacobian matrix of the nonlinear reconstruction operator (representative of the iterative algorithm) with respect to the data. We derive the desired Jacobian matrix for two types of nonlinear iterative algorithms: a fast variant of the standard iterative reweighted least-squares method and the contemporary split-Bregman algorithm, both of which can accommodate a wide variety of analysis- and synthesis-type regularizers. The proposed approach iteratively computes two weighted SURE-type measures: predicted-SURE and projected-SURE (which require knowledge of noise variance σ2), and GCV (which does not need σ2) for these algorithms. We apply the methods to image restoration and to magnetic resonance image (MRI) reconstruction using total variation and an analysis-type ℓ1-regularization. We demonstrate through simulations and experiments with real data that minimizing predicted-SURE and projected-SURE consistently lead to near-MSE-optimal reconstructions. We also observe that minimizing GCV yields reconstruction results that are near-MSE-optimal for image restoration and slightly suboptimal for MRI. Theoretical derivations in this paper related to Jacobian matrix evaluations can be extended, in principle, to other types of regularizers and reconstruction algorithms.
  • Keywords
    Gaussian noise; Jacobian matrices; biomedical MRI; image restoration; inverse problems; iterative methods; least squares approximations; mean square error methods; medical image processing; GCV; Jacobian matrix; MRI reconstruction; SURE-based methods; Stein unbiased risk estimate; additive Gaussian noise; analysis- type l1-regularization; generalized cross-validation approach; inverse problems; magnetic resonance image reconstruction; near-MSE-optimal reconstruction; noise variance; nonlinear iterative algorithms; nonlinear iterative image restoration; nonlinear reconstruction operator; regularization parameter selection; regularized iterative reconstruction algorithms; split-Bregman algorithm; standard iterative reweighted least-squares method; weighted SURE-type measures; weighted mean-squared error approach; Estimation; Image restoration; Magnetic resonance imaging; Generalized cross-validation (GCV); Stein´s unbiased risk estimate (SURE); image restoration; magnetic resonance image (MRI) reconstruction; regularization parameter; Algorithms; Brain; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Image Enhancement; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Nonlinear Dynamics; Normal Distribution; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1057-7149
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TIP.2012.2195015
  • Filename
    6185677