• DocumentCode
    1498599
  • Title

    A comparison of the conductor requirements for energy storage devices made with ideal coil geometries

  • Author

    Hassenzahl, W.

  • Author_Institution
    Lawrence Berkeley Lab., California Univ., CA
  • Volume
    25
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1989
  • fDate
    3/1/1989 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1799
  • Lastpage
    1802
  • Abstract
    Superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) plants have previously been proposed in both solenoidal and toroidal geometries. The former is efficient in terms of the quantity of superconductor required per unit of stored energy. For applications where a fringe field could be a problem, the toroidal geometry, which requires at least a factor of two more material, has been proposed. In addition to the solenoid and toroid, other geometries are possible, such as linear multipoles and spherical coils. These geometries have been considered for use in applications other than energy storage. Here the effectiveness (quantity of superconductor/stored energy) is calculated for various coil geometries
  • Keywords
    superconducting magnet energy storage; SMES; conductor requirements; energy storage devices; external stray field; fringe field; ideal coil geometries; linear multipoles; solenoidal geometries; spherical coils; superconducting magnetic energy storage; superconductor required per unit of stored energy; superconductor/stored energy; toroidal geometries; Conductors; Energy storage; Geometry; Laboratories; Magnetic devices; Samarium; Solenoids; Superconducting coils; Superconducting magnetic energy storage; Thin wall structures;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/20.92651
  • Filename
    92651