DocumentCode
1498599
Title
A comparison of the conductor requirements for energy storage devices made with ideal coil geometries
Author
Hassenzahl, W.
Author_Institution
Lawrence Berkeley Lab., California Univ., CA
Volume
25
Issue
2
fYear
1989
fDate
3/1/1989 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
1799
Lastpage
1802
Abstract
Superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) plants have previously been proposed in both solenoidal and toroidal geometries. The former is efficient in terms of the quantity of superconductor required per unit of stored energy. For applications where a fringe field could be a problem, the toroidal geometry, which requires at least a factor of two more material, has been proposed. In addition to the solenoid and toroid, other geometries are possible, such as linear multipoles and spherical coils. These geometries have been considered for use in applications other than energy storage. Here the effectiveness (quantity of superconductor/stored energy) is calculated for various coil geometries
Keywords
superconducting magnet energy storage; SMES; conductor requirements; energy storage devices; external stray field; fringe field; ideal coil geometries; linear multipoles; solenoidal geometries; spherical coils; superconducting magnetic energy storage; superconductor required per unit of stored energy; superconductor/stored energy; toroidal geometries; Conductors; Energy storage; Geometry; Laboratories; Magnetic devices; Samarium; Solenoids; Superconducting coils; Superconducting magnetic energy storage; Thin wall structures;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9464
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/20.92651
Filename
92651
Link To Document