DocumentCode
1510157
Title
Evolution of the frameworks quagmire
Author
Sheard, Sarah A.
Author_Institution
Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, VA, USA
Volume
34
Issue
7
fYear
2001
fDate
7/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
96
Lastpage
98
Abstract
Various combinations of national and international standards bodies, government organizations, professional societies, and other quasilegislative bodies, each vying for influence over a particular market sector, have promulgated a dizzying array of software and system process standards, recommended practices, guidelines, maturity models, and other frameworks. The resulting quagmire has quenched the ardor of many organizations seeking accreditation for one or more frameworks. Software and systems engineers question whether the qualification process will lead to quarrels over interpretation rather than quick and real progress. In 1997, the Software Productivity Consortium created a Web site to help organizations understand which frameworks were most important and how they related to each other (http://www.software.org/quagmire). As the paper shows, many new frameworks and updates to existing frameworks have appeared since then. Fortunately, most of these additions recognize the need for compatibility and attempt to define their relationship with other models
Keywords
software development management; software process improvement; software standards; Capability Maturity Model; Web site; accreditation; guidelines; maturity models; recommended practices; software development frameworks; software management; software standards; Accreditation; Government; Guidelines; Productivity; Professional societies; Qualifications; Software standards; Software systems; Standards organizations; Systems engineering and theory;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Computer
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9162
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/2.933516
Filename
933516
Link To Document