• DocumentCode
    1515038
  • Title

    Why readability formulas fail

  • Author

    Bruce, Bertram ; Rubin, Andee ; Starr, Kathleen

  • Author_Institution
    Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., 50 Moulton St., Cambridge, MA 02138; University of Illinois´ Center for the Study of Reading
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1981
  • fDate
    3/1/1981 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    50
  • Lastpage
    52
  • Abstract
    Being able to measure the readability of a text with a simple formula is an attractive prospect, and many groups have been using readability formulas in a variety of situations where estimates of text complexity are thought to be necessary. The most obvious and explicit use of readability formulas is by educational publishers designing basal and remedial reading texts; some states, in fact, will consider using a basal series only if it fits certain readability formula criteria. Increasingly, public documents such as insurance policies, tax forms, contracts, and jury instructions must meet criteria stated in terms of readability formulas.
  • Keywords
    Context; Correlation; Cultural differences; Materials; Psychology; Readability metrics;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0361-1434
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TPC.1981.6447826
  • Filename
    6447826