Title :
Why readability formulas fail
Author :
Bruce, Bertram ; Rubin, Andee ; Starr, Kathleen
Author_Institution :
Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., 50 Moulton St., Cambridge, MA 02138; University of Illinois´ Center for the Study of Reading
fDate :
3/1/1981 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
Being able to measure the readability of a text with a simple formula is an attractive prospect, and many groups have been using readability formulas in a variety of situations where estimates of text complexity are thought to be necessary. The most obvious and explicit use of readability formulas is by educational publishers designing basal and remedial reading texts; some states, in fact, will consider using a basal series only if it fits certain readability formula criteria. Increasingly, public documents such as insurance policies, tax forms, contracts, and jury instructions must meet criteria stated in terms of readability formulas.
Keywords :
Context; Correlation; Cultural differences; Materials; Psychology; Readability metrics;
Journal_Title :
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TPC.1981.6447826