DocumentCode :
1522134
Title :
What accuracy statistics really measure [software estimation]
Author :
Kitchenham, B.A. ; Pickard, L.M. ; MacDonell, S.G. ; Shepperd, M.J.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Keele Univ., UK
Volume :
148
Issue :
3
fYear :
2001
fDate :
6/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
81
Lastpage :
85
Abstract :
Provides the software estimation research community with a better understanding of the meaning of, and relationship between, two statistics that are often used to assess the accuracy of predictive models: the mean magnitude relative error (MMRE) and the number of predictions within 25% of the actual, pred(25). It is demonstrated that MMRE and pred(25) are, respectively, measures of the spread and the kurtosis of the variable z, where z=estimate/actual. Thus, z is considered to be a measure of accuracy, and statistics such as MMRE and pred(25) to be measures of properties of the distribution of z. It is suggested that measures of the central location and skewness of z, as well as measures of spread and kurtosis, are necessary. Furthermore, since the distribution of z is non-normal, non-parametric measures of these properties may be needed. For this reason, box-plots of z are useful alternatives to simple summary metrics. It is also noted that the simple residuals are better behaved than the z variable, and could also be used as the basis for comparing prediction systems
Keywords :
nonparametric statistics; software cost estimation; software metrics; accuracy measures; accuracy statistics; box-plots; central location measure; kurtosis measure; mean magnitude relative error; nonnormal distribution; nonparametric measures; prediction number; prediction systems comparison; predictive models; residuals; skewness measure; software estimation; spread measure; statistical distribution properties; summary metrics;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Software, IEE Proceedings -
Publisher :
iet
ISSN :
1462-5970
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1049/ip-sen:20010506
Filename :
942859
Link To Document :
بازگشت