• DocumentCode
    1534952
  • Title

    Design and Evaluation of an Orthotic Knee-Extension Assist

  • Author

    Spring, Alexander N. ; Kofman, Jonathan ; Lemaire, Edward D.

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Volume
    20
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2012
  • Firstpage
    678
  • Lastpage
    687
  • Abstract
    Individuals with quadriceps muscle weakness often have difficulty generating the knee-extension moments required to complete common mobility tasks. A new device that provides knee-extension moments through a range of knee angles was designed to help individuals perform stand-to-sit and sit-to-stand tasks. The novel knee-extension assist (KEA) was designed as a modular component to be incorporated into existing knee-ankle-foot orthoses or used in a knee orthosis. During stand-to-sit, a set of springs is loaded as the knee flexes under bodyweight and the KEA thus provides a knee-extension moment that aids in achieving a smoothly controlled knee flexion. The springs can be locked in place at the end of knee flexion to prevent unwanted knee extension while the user is seated. The entire knee extension assist can be disengaged to allow free joint motion anytime the affected leg is unloaded. During sit-to-stand, the KEA assists knee extension by returning the energy stored in the springs as an extension moment. In mechanical testing of a prototype of the new KEA, a mean maximum extension moment of 42.9 ± 0.46 Nm was provided by the device during flexion and 28.4 ± 0.28 Nm during extension. A biomechanical evaluation with two able-bodied individuals demonstrated the effectiveness of the KEA in successfully assisting stand-to-sit and sit-to-stand tasks. During stand-to-sit, the KEA provided 82% and 75% of the total (muscle and KEA) knee-extension moment required by the braced leg for the task for the two subjects, respectively; and during sit-to-stand, the KEA provided 56% and 50% of the total knee-extension moment for the two subjects, respectively. This KEA performance exceeded 50% knee-extension moment assistance for a 70 kg person.
  • Keywords
    biomechanics; biomedical measurement; handicapped aids; medical disorders; muscle; orthotics; springs (mechanical); biomechanical evaluation; common mobility tasks; free joint motion; knee angle; knee extension moment generation; knee orthosis; knee-ankle-foot orthoses; knee-extension moment; mass 70 kg; mean maximum extension moment; orthotic knee extension assist design; orthotic knee extension assist evaluation; quadricep muscle weakness; sit to stand task; smoothly controlled knee flexion; springs; stand to sit task; Assembly; Force; Joints; Knee; Muscles; Springs; Testing; Design; evaluation; extension-assist; knee moment; knee orthosis; knee–ankle– foot orthosis (KAFO); sit-to-stand; stand-to-sit; Computer-Aided Design; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure Analysis; Humans; Joint Instability; Knee Joint; Knee Prosthesis; Orthotic Devices; Robotics;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1534-4320
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2202250
  • Filename
    6213560