DocumentCode :
1537311
Title :
Affordable ways to improve application development
Author :
Brouse, Peggy S. ; Buys, Ruth T.
Author_Institution :
Syst. Eng. & Oper. Res. Dept., George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA, USA
Volume :
1
Issue :
4
fYear :
1999
Firstpage :
47
Lastpage :
52
Abstract :
If an important client suddenly required that you conform to a process standard, could you afford to do so? Could you afford not to? The 3P Process Improvement Strategy is the answer. Two cases illustrate its benefits. In one case, a CMM Level 1 organization underwent a CMM based assessment for Internal Process Improvement less than one year after working with elements of 3P. The certifying agency found it compliant in all but one key process area, and the certification cost the company less than $100000 (US). In a second case, a small firm won a major procurement and has been vocal in crediting the win to efforts associated with the 3P strategy. The strategy derives its name from its core components: policies, processes, and products. The 3P approach is primarily pragmatic: it supports the notion that compliance with an established standard should serve as a sanity check, not an end in itself. Using 3P, you start with business and technical self-assessments, which lead directly to the improvement of a single process (or, if you have the resources, many processes). Your plans need not be elaborate, but must be complete. 3P provides a six-step program to help you monitor your progress. Monitoring is key: if you get commitment from your boss, yourself, and your team to honest assessment, the improvement program will yield long term benefits
Keywords :
certification; software development management; software process improvement; software standards; 3P Process Improvement Strategy; CMM Level 1 organization; CMM based assessment; Internal Process Improvement; application development; certification; certifying agency; established standard; honest assessment; improvement program; process standard; procurement; technical self-assessments; Capability maturity model; Contracts; Costs; Government; Hardware; Monitoring; Pressing; Procurement; Software engineering; Subcontracting;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
IT Professional
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1520-9202
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/6294.781625
Filename :
781625
Link To Document :
بازگشت