• DocumentCode
    1544762
  • Title

    When expert advice works, and when it does not

  • Author

    Woodhouse, E.J. ; Nieusma, Dean

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Sci. & Technol. Studies, Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY, USA
  • Volume
    16
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1997
  • Firstpage
    23
  • Lastpage
    29
  • Abstract
    Both experts and users of expertise fail to grasp the role of expertise in decision making. Of course, expert advice is essential in complex human activities, but those who follow that advice also sometimes regret it. Under what conditions does expert advice and action tend to produce satisfactory outcomes? Recent studies of technological controversies and governmental regulatory procedures reveal some of the conditions under which expert advice may work well, and conditions under which it does not. Before considering these situations, the authors review two mental models (simple and cynical) that obstruct clear thinking about what users of expertise should expect from professional knowledge and what professionals should seek to contribute to technological controversies and other situations requiring expertise
  • Keywords
    professional aspects; psychology; clear thinking; complex human activities; cynical mental model; decision making; expert advice; expertise; governmental regulatory procedures; professional knowledge; satisfactory outcomes; simple mental model; technological controversies; Automobiles; Decision making; Government; Humans; NASA; Pollution; Power generation economics; Production; Research and development; Springs;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0097
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/44.584648
  • Filename
    584648