DocumentCode :
1544762
Title :
When expert advice works, and when it does not
Author :
Woodhouse, E.J. ; Nieusma, Dean
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Sci. & Technol. Studies, Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY, USA
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
fYear :
1997
Firstpage :
23
Lastpage :
29
Abstract :
Both experts and users of expertise fail to grasp the role of expertise in decision making. Of course, expert advice is essential in complex human activities, but those who follow that advice also sometimes regret it. Under what conditions does expert advice and action tend to produce satisfactory outcomes? Recent studies of technological controversies and governmental regulatory procedures reveal some of the conditions under which expert advice may work well, and conditions under which it does not. Before considering these situations, the authors review two mental models (simple and cynical) that obstruct clear thinking about what users of expertise should expect from professional knowledge and what professionals should seek to contribute to technological controversies and other situations requiring expertise
Keywords :
professional aspects; psychology; clear thinking; complex human activities; cynical mental model; decision making; expert advice; expertise; governmental regulatory procedures; professional knowledge; satisfactory outcomes; simple mental model; technological controversies; Automobiles; Decision making; Government; Humans; NASA; Pollution; Power generation economics; Production; Research and development; Springs;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0278-0097
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/44.584648
Filename :
584648
Link To Document :
بازگشت