DocumentCode
1544762
Title
When expert advice works, and when it does not
Author
Woodhouse, E.J. ; Nieusma, Dean
Author_Institution
Dept. of Sci. & Technol. Studies, Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY, USA
Volume
16
Issue
1
fYear
1997
Firstpage
23
Lastpage
29
Abstract
Both experts and users of expertise fail to grasp the role of expertise in decision making. Of course, expert advice is essential in complex human activities, but those who follow that advice also sometimes regret it. Under what conditions does expert advice and action tend to produce satisfactory outcomes? Recent studies of technological controversies and governmental regulatory procedures reveal some of the conditions under which expert advice may work well, and conditions under which it does not. Before considering these situations, the authors review two mental models (simple and cynical) that obstruct clear thinking about what users of expertise should expect from professional knowledge and what professionals should seek to contribute to technological controversies and other situations requiring expertise
Keywords
professional aspects; psychology; clear thinking; complex human activities; cynical mental model; decision making; expert advice; expertise; governmental regulatory procedures; professional knowledge; satisfactory outcomes; simple mental model; technological controversies; Automobiles; Decision making; Government; Humans; NASA; Pollution; Power generation economics; Production; Research and development; Springs;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0097
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/44.584648
Filename
584648
Link To Document