Author :
Ge, Weiyan ; Zhang, Junshan ; Xue, Guoliang
Author_Institution :
Corp. R&D Div., Qualcomm Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
Abstract :
Multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) technology, which is a recent breakthrough in wireless communications, has been shown to significantly improve channel capacity in single-user systems. However, obtaining a rigorous understanding of the possible MIMO gains in multihop networks is still an open topic. One grand challenge is that multihop wireless networks are interference limited and that the interference introduces coupling across various layers of the protocol stack, including the physical (PHY), medium access control (MAC), network, and transport layers. The fundamental differences between multihop networks and point-to-point settings dictate that leveraging the MIMO gains in multihop networks requires a domain change from high-SNR regimes to interference-limited regimes. In this paper, we develop a cross-layer optimization framework for effective interference management toward understanding fundamental tradeoffs among possible MIMO gains in multihop networks. We first take a bottom-up approach to develop a MIMO-pipe model based on PHY interference and extract a set of {(Ri, SINRi) }, where each pair (Ri, SINRi) corresponds to a meaningful stream multiplexing configuration for individual MIMO links [with Ri being the rate and SINRi being the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) requirement]. Using this link abstraction model, we study MIMO-pipe scheduling for throughput maximization. Based on continuous relaxation via randomization, we study the structural property of the optimal scheduling policy. Our findings reveal that, in an optimal strategy, it suffices for each MIMO link to use one stream configuration only (although each individual MIMO link can have multiple stream configurations). In light of this structural property, we then formulate MIMO-pipe scheduling as a combinatorial optimization problem, and by using a multidimensional 0-1 knapsack approach, we devise centralized approximation algorithms fo- - r both the dense network model and the extended network model, respectively. Next, we also develop a contention-based distributed algorithm, in which links update their contention probability based on local information only, and characterize the convergence and the performance of the distributed algorithm.
Keywords :
MIMO systems; access protocols; channel capacity; combinatorial mathematics; distributed algorithms; interference (signal); knapsack problems; optimisation; probability; radio links; radio networks; scheduling; MAC; MIMO gains; MIMO link; MIMO technology; MIMO-pipe modeling; MIMO-pipe scheduling; PHY interference; approximation algorithms; channel capacity; combinatorial optimization problem; contention probability; contention-based distributed algorithm; continuous relaxation; cross-layer optimization framework; dense network model; efficient interference management; interference limited; interference-limited regimes; link abstraction model; medium access control; multidimensional 0-1 knapsack approach; multihop MIMO networks; multihop networks; multihop wireless networks; multiple-input-multiple-output technology; optimal scheduling policy; point-to-point settings; protocol stack; randomization; signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio; single-user systems; throughput maximization; transport layers; wireless communications; Channel capacity; Distributed algorithms; Interference; MIMO; Optimal scheduling; Spread spectrum communication; Transport protocols; Wireless application protocol; Wireless communication; Wireless networks; Cross-layer optimization; MIMO link abstraction; multihop multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) networks; physical interference; throughput maximization; wireless scheduling;