• DocumentCode
    1545697
  • Title

    Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation [discussion and closure]

  • Author

    Mittelstadt, W.A. ; Chowdhury, Badrul H. ; Taylor, C.W.

  • Author_Institution
    Bonneville Power Adm., Vancouver, WA
  • Volume
    16
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    11/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    931
  • Lastpage
    932
  • Abstract
    The author congratulates the authors of the original paper (see ibid., vol.15, no.4, p.1354-9, 2000) on their excellent and needed comparison of two methods of performing voltage stability analysis. He argues that these results emphasize the importance of using the best possible model in planning and operating decisions affecting the reliability and cost of the electric transmission system. He believes that the two-step process suggested of using V-Q or P-Q analysis for screening, and using dynamic simulation for critical cases affecting operating limits or investment decisions, should be followed. The original authors´ response to this discussion is also included
  • Keywords
    control system analysis; costing; load flow control; power system dynamic stability; power transmission control; power transmission economics; power transmission reliability; transmission network calculations; P-Q analysis; V-Q analysis; V-Q power flow simulation; dynamic simulation; investment decisions; operating decisions; operating limits; planning decisions; power system voltage stability analysis; screening; transmission system cost; transmission system reliability; Analytical models; Load flow; Power system analysis computing; Power system dynamics; Power system planning; Power system simulation; Reactive power; Security; Stability analysis; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-8950
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/59.962453
  • Filename
    962453