• DocumentCode
    1545739
  • Title

    Overall Cost Comparison Between Cable and Overhead Lines Including the Costs for Repair After Random Failures

  • Author

    Benato, Roberto ; Napolitano, Domenico

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Ind. Eng., Univ. of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Volume
    27
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    7/1/2012 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1213
  • Lastpage
    1222
  • Abstract
    This paper deals with the comparison between the overall whole-of-life costs of overhead lines (OHL) and those of underground insulated cables (UGC). Almost all the investigations published so far, when analyzing maintainability issues, take into account only the costs of planned/periodical maintenance; here, a method for assessing also the expenses sustained for repair after random failures is proposed. The number of random failure events for each kind of component over the entire service life of a transmission line can only be predicted on a probabilistic basis: its expected value is estimated by making use of the relevant mean failure rates from recent statistical surveys. The entire procedure is shown by carrying out a particular case study as an example; the break-even point between the OHL-UGC overall costs, corresponding to a typical rural land Italian market value wx = 26.9 Euros/m2, is identified. Nonetheless, the method may be widely applied to any type of OHL-UGC comparison.
  • Keywords
    power cable insulation; power overhead lines; underground cables; Italian market value; OHL-UGC comparison; cable lines; overhead lines; planned/periodical maintenance; random failures; repair costs; transmission line; typical rural land; underground insulated cables; Cable insulation; Economics; Energy loss; Investments; Maintenance engineering; Power cables; Shunts (electrical); Insulated cables; overall cost comparison; overhead lines; repair cost;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-8977
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2191803
  • Filename
    6222056