• DocumentCode
    1547235
  • Title

    Loop-free hybrid single-path/flooding routing algorithms with guaranteed delivery for wireless networks

  • Author

    Stojmenovic, Ivan ; Lin, Xu

  • Author_Institution
    UNAM, Ottawa Univ., Ont., Canada
  • Volume
    12
  • Issue
    10
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    10/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1023
  • Lastpage
    1032
  • Abstract
    In a localized routing algorithm, each node makes forwarding decisions solely based on the position of itself, its neighbors, and its destination. In distance, progress, and direction-based approaches´(reported in the literature), when node A wants to send or forward message m to destination node D, it forwards m to its neighbor C which is closest to D (has best progress toward D, whose direction is closest to the direction of D, respectively) among all neighbors of A. The same procedure is repeated until D, if possible, is eventually reached. The algorithms are referred to as GEDIR, MFR, and DIR when a common failure criterion is introduced: The algorithm stops if the best choice for the current node is the node from which the message came. We propose 2-hop GEDIR, DIR, and MFR methods in which node A selects the best candidate node C among its 1-hop and 2-hop neighbors according to the corresponding criterion and forwards m to its best 1-hop neighbor among joint neighbors of A and C. We then propose flooding GEDIR and MFR and hybrid single-path/flooding GEDIR and MFR methods which are the first localized algorithms (other than full flooding) to guarantee the message delivery (in a collision-free environment). We show that the directional routing methods are not loop-free, while the GEDIR and MFR-based methods are inherently loop free. The simulation experiments, with static random graphs, show that GEDIR and MFR have similar success rates, which is low for low degree graphs and high for high degree ones. When successful, their hop counts are near the performance of the shortest path algorithm. Hybrid single-path/flooding GEDIR and MFR methods have low communication overheads. The results are also confirmed by experiments with moving nodes and MAC layer
  • Keywords
    distributed algorithms; mobile computing; protocols; telecommunication network routing; 2-hop DIR; 2-hop GEDIR; 2-hop MFR methods; DIR; GEDIR; MAC layer; MFR; best candidate node; broadcasting; collision-free environment; common failure criterion; communication overheads; directional routing methods; distributed algorithms; flooding GEDIR methods; flooding MFR methods; forwarding decisions; guaranteed delivery; hop counts; hybrid single-path/flooding GEDIR methods; hybrid single-path/flooding MFR methods; localized algorithms; localized routing algorithm; loop-free hybrid single-path/flooding routing algorithms; message delivery; shortest path algorithm; wireless networks; Broadcasting; Communication system control; Distributed algorithms; Floods; Global Positioning System; Online Communities/Technical Collaboration; Remote monitoring; Routing protocols; Wireless networks; Wireless sensor networks;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1045-9219
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/71.963415
  • Filename
    963415