Abstract :
Optical remote sensing images of land cover are composed of many natural and man-made objects and thus exhibit rich image features ranging from low to high levels. Extracting such a wide range of features to represent the optical remote sensing images, beyond edge primitives, is a long-standing goal in the remote sensing and vision research community. The recently proposed deconvolution network (DN) can effectively learn and capture features in a variety of forms: low-level edges, midlevel edge junctions, high-level object parts, and complete objects. The approach is based on the convolutional decomposition of images under an L1 sparsity constraint. Unfortunately, the L1 regularizer cannot enforce further sparsity, hence limiting the practical efficacy of the DN in optical remote sensing representation and processing. In this paper, we extend the DN by incorporating the L1/2 sparsity constraint, which we name the L1/2-DN. The L1/2 regularizer not only induces sparsity but is also a better choice among Lq, (0<;q<;1) regularizers. Furthermore, the L1/2-DN algorithm is more efficient, provides a sparser representation, and results in more accurate recovery than the DN. We illustrate the utility of our method on a wide range of optical remote sensing images and compare our results to those yielded by other state-of-the-art methods.
Keywords :
geophysical image processing; geophysical techniques; image representation; image restoration; land cover; optical images; remote sensing; DN; DN practical efficacy limiting; L1/2 sparsity constraint; L1/2-DN algorithm; L1/2-regularized deconvolution network; L1 sparsity constraint; complete objects; edge primitives; effectively capture feature; effectively learn feature; high level range; high-level object parts; image convolutional decomposition; land cover; low level range; low-level edges; man-made object; method utility; midlevel edge junctions; natural object; optical remote sensing image representation; optical remote sensing image restoration; optical remote sensing processing; optical remote sensing representation; rich image features; sparser representation; state-of-the-art methods; vision research community; wide feature range extraction; wide optical remote sensing image range; $L_{1/2}$ regularizer; $L_{1/2}$ regularizer; Deconvolution network (DN); image recovery; image representation; optical image;