Author_Institution :
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, Ottawa, Ont., Canada
Abstract :
In the 1960s, stereoscopic methods were first applied to radar images to derive ground elevation. Unfortunately, research uncovered contradictions between error propagation theory and practical results. These contradictions combined with the lack of stereo radar pairs led to the decline of radargrammetry. The launch in 1995 of RADARSAT, with its various operating modes and specific geometric characteristics, has turned the tide. The error propagation of the radargrammetric DEM generated from different RADARSAT stereo configurations is then quantitatively evaluated along the full processing chain (stereo model set-up with ground control points (GCPs), image matching and three-dimensional (3-D) intersection). Two matching algorithms are used: 1) automatic and 2) computer-assisted visual matching. The GCP collection method using stereoscopic plotting is a requisite to achieve the best results for the stereo model and DEM. The automatic matching gives slightly better results than the computer-assisted visual matching, except when the radiometric disparities in the stereo images are too large. Since the geometric advantage (not involved in the automatic matching) can compensate for the radiometric disadvantage, visual matching, which combines both aspects, is a better method in these conditions. Consequently, these two algorithms can be used in a two-step method to generate the best DEM whatever the stereo configuration. Since the relief is an important parameter in the final accuracy, geometric versus radiometric disparity tradeoffs and general guidelines are suggested for selecting RADARSAT stereo pairs for DEM generation as a function of terrain relief
Keywords :
error analysis; geophysical signal processing; image matching; radar imaging; remote sensing by radar; stereo image processing; terrain mapping; topography (Earth); RADARSAT images; automatic matching; computer-assisted visual matching; error propagation; error tracking; geometric advantage; ground control point; image matching; radar images; radargrammetric DEM; radiometric disadvantage; stereo model; stereoscopic methods; stereoscopic plotting; terrain relief; three-dimensional intersection; two-step method; Artificial satellites; Computer errors; Error correction; Radar imaging; Radar tracking; Radiometry; Remote sensing; Spaceborne radar; Synthetic aperture radar; Tides;