DocumentCode :
1554295
Title :
Comparison of the main magnetic resonance imaging acceleration strategies based on parallel imaging techniques
Author :
Fabregat, J.A. ; Moratal, D. ; Bonmatí, L.M. ; Brummer, M.E.
Author_Institution :
Unidad de I+D y Nuevos Productos, Vossloh Espana, Valencia, Spain
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
fYear :
2011
fDate :
3/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
749
Lastpage :
758
Abstract :
The main parallel imaging techniques have been implemented under MATLAB (SENSE, PILS and SPACE-RIP for image domain, and SMASH and GRAPPA for k-space domain), evaluating its characteristics about image quality and signal to noise ratio. PILS and SMASH, with an specific coil configuration, provided the best results. SENSE and SPACE-RIP were more versatile with any coil configuration. All methods arrived to its acceleration factor theoretical limit (R=4 for 4 coils) with images without noise. Only those methods that depend on a matrix reconstruction inversion (SENSE and SPACE-RIP) did not arrive to the theoretical limit for noisy images due to its instability problems. PILS provided the best results although SENSE and SPACE-RIP can be applied under more general conditions. For the k-space domain methods, SMASH gave the best results under an specific coil array configuration.
Keywords :
image processing; magnetic resonance imaging; MATLAB; PILS; SENSE; SPACE-RIP; acceleration strategies; image domain; magnetic resonance imaging; matrix reconstruction inversion; parallel imaging techniques; specific coil array configuration; Acceleration; Arrays; Coils; Encoding; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sensitivity; GRAPPA; PILS; SENSE; SMASH; SPACE-RIP; acceleration techniques; magnetic resonance imaging; parallel imaging;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Latin America Transactions, IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina)
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1548-0992
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TLA.2011.5876415
Filename :
5876415
Link To Document :
بازگشت