Title :
Transient response of a tall object to lightning
Author :
Rakov, Vladimir A.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Florida Univ., Gainesville, FL, USA
fDate :
11/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
Experimental data showing the transient behavior of tall objects struck by lightning are reviewed. The influence of this transient behavior, illustrated by simple calculations, on measured lightning current and measured remote electromagnetic fields is discussed. The estimated equivalent impedance of the lightning channel at the time of the initial current peak is appreciably higher than the characteristic impedance of an ordinary tall object (a factor of 3 or so for both the Ostankino and Peissenberg towers and about a factor of 2 for the CN tower). The grounding impedance of a tower is typically lower than its characteristic impedance. Thus, the current reflection coefficient is negative at the top and positive at the bottom of the tower. The similarity of the statistical distributions of subsequent-return-stroke peak currents in: 1) natural downward lightning; 2) natural upward (object-initiated) lightning; and 3) rocket-triggered lightning measured at objects with heights ranging from 4.5 to 540 m suggests that current peaks are not significantly influenced by the presence of a tall object, provided that measurements are taken at the top of the object. This inference is consistent with modeling results of Melander (1984) who showed that the current peaks measured in Switzerland and Italy at the top of 70-m and 40-m towers, respectively, are essentially unaffected by the presence of the towers. If lightning current could be represented by an ideal current source, current at the top of the object would be equal to the source current at all times. The peak current measured at the bottom of a tall object is usually more strongly influenced by the transient process in the object than the peak current at the top. For example, peak currents measured in the lower part of the 540-m Ostankino tower are about a factor of two higher than the peak currents measured near the tower top because the current reflection coefficient at the bottom of the tower is near +1. Observations and modeling suggest that a tall metallic strike object replacing the lower part of lightning channel serves to enhance the lightning-radiated electromagnetic fields relative to the fields due to similar lightning discharges attached directly to ground, this effect being more pronounced for the sharper lightning current pulses
Keywords :
earthing; electric impedance; lightning; poles and towers; transient response; 4.5 to 540 m; CN tower; Ostankino tower; Peissenberg tower; characteristic impedance; current peak; current reflection coefficient; equivalent impedance; grounding impedance; lightning channel; lightning current; lightning discharges; natural downward lightning; natural upward lightning; remote electromagnetic fields; return-stroke current; rocket-triggered lightning; statistical distributions; tall metallic strike object; tall objects; transient response; traveling waves; Current measurement; Electromagnetic fields; Electromagnetic measurements; Electromagnetic transients; Grounding; Impedance; Lightning; Optical reflection; Poles and towers; Transient response;
Journal_Title :
Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on