• DocumentCode
    1584698
  • Title

    Biomass power as a firm utility resource: Bigger not necessarily better or cheaper

  • Author

    Carlson, William H.

  • Author_Institution
    Carlson Small Power Consultants, Redding, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    A rush to biomass power is underway in the U.S. with both public and consumer owned utilities proposing their first biomass power facilities. The average size of facility proposed is rising rapidly, supposedly to capture economies of scale. Unique to biomass, ever larger plants may not yield lower busbar costs. In many locales, a combination of fuel constraints, capped incentive programs, loss of local options and availability of combined heat and power (CHP) options lead to the optimization of the facility at a much smaller size. In the Oregon example included a 10 MWe CHP plant yields a substantially lower busbar cost than a 100 MWe stand alone plant.
  • Keywords
    bioenergy conversion; cogeneration; steam power stations; CHP; biomass power facilities; busbar; combined heat and power; firm utility resource; Biomass; Cogeneration; Constraint optimization; Costs; Crops; Economies of scale; Forestry; Fuels; IEEE news; Pulp and paper industry; Biomass power; CHP; optimum size;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES '09. IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Calgary, AB
  • ISSN
    1944-9925
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4241-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PES.2009.5275564
  • Filename
    5275564