DocumentCode
1584698
Title
Biomass power as a firm utility resource: Bigger not necessarily better or cheaper
Author
Carlson, William H.
Author_Institution
Carlson Small Power Consultants, Redding, CA, USA
fYear
2009
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
A rush to biomass power is underway in the U.S. with both public and consumer owned utilities proposing their first biomass power facilities. The average size of facility proposed is rising rapidly, supposedly to capture economies of scale. Unique to biomass, ever larger plants may not yield lower busbar costs. In many locales, a combination of fuel constraints, capped incentive programs, loss of local options and availability of combined heat and power (CHP) options lead to the optimization of the facility at a much smaller size. In the Oregon example included a 10 MWe CHP plant yields a substantially lower busbar cost than a 100 MWe stand alone plant.
Keywords
bioenergy conversion; cogeneration; steam power stations; CHP; biomass power facilities; busbar; combined heat and power; firm utility resource; Biomass; Cogeneration; Constraint optimization; Costs; Crops; Economies of scale; Forestry; Fuels; IEEE news; Pulp and paper industry; Biomass power; CHP; optimum size;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES '09. IEEE
Conference_Location
Calgary, AB
ISSN
1944-9925
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-4241-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PES.2009.5275564
Filename
5275564
Link To Document