• DocumentCode
    1587875
  • Title

    How Does IEEE 1453 compare to the GE curve in evaluating flicker compliance

  • Author

    Burch, Reuben F., IV

  • Author_Institution
    Alabama Power Co., Birmingham, AL, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    The ldquoGE Curverdquo has been in use for many years by most utilities as their sole criteria for determining the serviceability of connected loads to their electrical system. This long term usage has bred familiarity with both the method and the criteria. In recent years, the IEEE Voltage Flicker TF undertook the task of adopting the IEC method of determining flicker. This was done so as to bring about International consensus concerning flicker criteria as well as noting the deficiency of the ldquoGE Curverdquo method compared to the advantages of the IEC method. As a result, IEEE 1453-2004 was adopted as a better method to address flicker limits. As the differences in the two methods has been documented by others already, this paper will just discuss differences in the application of the two methods in order to encourage others to use this more beneficial method.
  • Keywords
    IEEE standards; electricity supply industry; power markets; GE curve; IEEE 1453; electrical system; flicker compliance; serviceability; Engineering profession; Frequency; IEC; Shape; Voltage fluctuations; Flicker; GE Curve; Pst; Shape factor;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES '09. IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Calgary, AB
  • ISSN
    1944-9925
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-4241-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PES.2009.5275668
  • Filename
    5275668