• DocumentCode
    1603322
  • Title

    Optimization of MR-Relaxometry for BMD-measurements and its Correlation with DEXA

  • Author

    Alam, N. Riyahi ; Bakhtiary, M. ; Oghabian, M.A. ; Ghasemzadeh, A. ; Ghanaati, H. ; Sarkar, S. ; Larijani, B. ; Hamidy, Z. ; Shakery, N.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Med. Phys., Tehran Univ. of Med. Sci.
  • fYear
    2006
  • Firstpage
    638
  • Lastpage
    641
  • Abstract
    The aim of this study was to optimize MRI conventional protocols for BMD measurements using MR-relaxometry in systems not facilitated with special multi echo protocols. Since, cortical and trabecular bone separation can not be performed in DEXA, so the results might lead to erroneous interpretation of BMD values. One method for bone quality determination is MR relaxometry that derives R2(=1/T2), R2*(=1/T2*) and R2´(=R2*-R2). This study was performed by 1.5T MRI system (Picker Vista-Q800), a uniformity phantom(1.25gr/l CuSO4, with T2=200 ms for calibration), a body RF-Coil, 7 normal, 7 osteopenia, 7 osteoporosis volunteers and Lunar DEXA system (DPX-MD). To determine R2* and R2, multi GE and SE protocols with different TE/TR were used. Then in phantom and in coronal section of femoral-neck, relaxation rates were compared with BMD. The slope of neperian-logarithm of signal vs. TE in GE as -R2* used for protocol optimization. Therefore, for phantom calibration, optimized GE parameters of TE=13.42/18/26.8 ms, TR=800ms and ST=8mm used for the measurement of R2*, while, the measurement of R2 required the optimized SE parameters of TE=30/60/90/ 120ms, TR=800ms and ST=8mm, with CV(R2*)=2.96%, CV(R2)=3%, respectively. In volunteers for SE, TE of 36/54/63/72ms and TR=800ms were used, while, for GE the TEs/TR were the same as those of phantom study. R2* and R2´ showed a significant positive correlation with BMD, r=0.62(p<0.05) & r=0.62(p<0.05) respectively. Finally, in accordance with DEXA values, the results showed that MR-relaxometry is a proper tool for BMD-measurements in femoral-neck. Also it may be used as a complement method for DEXA failure in BMD-assessments
  • Keywords
    biomedical MRI; bone; calibration; diseases; optimisation; phantoms; 1.5 T; 120 ms; 200 ms; 30 ms; 36 ms; 54 ms; 60 ms; 63 ms; 72 ms; 90 ms; BMD-measurements; Lunar DEXA system; MR-relaxometry; MRI; RF-coil; bone quality determination; cortical bone; femoral neck; neperian logarithm; optimisation; osteopenia; osteoporosis; phantom calibration; trabecular bone; uniformity phantom; Biochemistry; Biomedical imaging; Cancellous bone; Imaging phantoms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Minerals; Osteoporosis; Protocols; Spine; Tellurium;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the
  • Conference_Location
    Shanghai
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8741-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616494
  • Filename
    1616494