• DocumentCode
    1623347
  • Title

    Gain and phase margin controller tuning: FOPTD or IPDT model-based methods?

  • Author

    Jones, R.W. ; Tham, M.T.

  • Author_Institution
    Seoul Nat. Univ. of Technol., South Korea
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2004
  • Firstpage
    1139
  • Abstract
    Control problems have been experienced with FOPTD-based PID tuning methods when the normalized dead-time of the process model is small. One proposed solution has been to treat the FOPTD system model, with small normalized dead-time, as an integral plus dead time (IPDT) process for controller tuning purposes. There has been very little work though on investigating the transition point, as a normalized dead-time value, when the designer should choose to use either FOPTD-based or IPDT-based PID control design methods. This contribution considers finding the transition point(s) for the gain and phase margin design method. For a range of values of normalized dead-time the performance of the IPDT-based PI controller will be compared with that of the FOPTD-based PI controller for both set-point response and load disturbance rejection.
  • Keywords
    PI control; control system synthesis; gain control; phase control; three-term control; FOPTD model-based method; FOPTD-based PID control design; IPDT model-based method; IPDT-based PID control design; PI controller; PID tuning method; first-order plus time delay; gain margin controller tuning; integral plus dead-time; load disturbance rejection; phase margin controller tuning; set-point response;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    SICE 2004 Annual Conference
  • Conference_Location
    Sapporo
  • Print_ISBN
    4-907764-22-7
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    1491590