An ameliorated methodology to establish the analogy between business process perspective views and UML diagrams

Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a de-facto standard design language developed by three amigos. The standardization of diagram is attributed to well defined syntactics and semantics of the language. Unfortunately, the pragmatics is vague in its utility and granulation. Since, the pragmatics are dependents on syntactics & semantics and semantics in turn depends on syntactics and pragmatics. The pragmatics can be evolved from the solution of an equation containing more than one variable. The pragmatics cannot be abstracted uniquely and as the dependency is functionality unknown. To abstract unique pragmatics for each UML diagram, we consider stereotype of perspective view of the business process as a view of software development projects. Thus knowing the perspective views of the business process (stereotype for set of UML diagrams) and abstracting its well defined pragmatics the syntactics and semantics of perspective views are abstracted through the logical positivism and the uniqueness is established through the mathematical empiricism. Then through the establishment of syntactical & semantical analogy between each perspective view of the business process and set of UML diagrams using divide and conquer analogy algorithm, the uniqueness of pragmatics of each diagram is established. In this process the authentication, the abstraction and its uniqueness is established through mathematical equations. Further, the syntactics are granulated and mensurated to enable each syntactics to participate as a single atom. Thus, additionally atomicity of the syntactics is established to enable them to participate uniquely in the different perspective views.