DocumentCode
1683218
Title
Notice of Retraction
The tale of two cities: The paths of innovative city in China
Author
Lu, Yanwei ; Zhu, Yanmei ; Li, Jinghua ; Wu, Kaizhang
Author_Institution
Research Centre for Technology Innovation and Service, Management, School of Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
fYear
2011
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
5
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The innovative city is the key of innovative country building. In this paper, we compare two modes of innovative city by dual-case study. The different paths are the government-dominant model of learning with research and production (LRP) in Shanghai, and the business-dominant independent innovation model in Shenzhen. In the view of resource allocation, it means the “great government” mode and the “strong business” mode, respectively. The conclusion is that, the concept of innovative city contains the concept of creative city in China. Therefore, the construction of innovative city concerns in economy growth, old town reconstruction, and new town construction simultaneously. It is the cause of diversity in the paths of innovative city in China.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The innovative city is the key of innovative country building. In this paper, we compare two modes of innovative city by dual-case study. The different paths are the government-dominant model of learning with research and production (LRP) in Shanghai, and the business-dominant independent innovation model in Shenzhen. In the view of resource allocation, it means the “great government” mode and the “strong business” mode, respectively. The conclusion is that, the concept of innovative city contains the concept of creative city in China. Therefore, the construction of innovative city concerns in economy growth, old town reconstruction, and new town construction simultaneously. It is the cause of diversity in the paths of innovative city in China.
Keywords
Buildings; Cities and towns; Economics; Government; Investments; Production; Technological innovation; Shanghai; Shenzhen; comparison study; innovative city; innovative rsource;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
E -Business and E -Government (ICEE), 2011 International Conference on
Conference_Location
Shanghai, China
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-8691-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICEBEG.2011.5887235
Filename
5887235
Link To Document