DocumentCode
168326
Title
A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows
Author
Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sunje ; Lavasa, Artemis ; Herterich, Patricia ; Rueda, Laura ; Kotarski, Rachael ; Newbold, Elizabeth
Author_Institution
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
fYear
2014
fDate
8-12 Sept. 2014
Firstpage
281
Lastpage
284
Abstract
Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.
Keywords
data integration; digital libraries; meta data; OAIS conceptual model; PID assignment; conceptual workflow models; data curation; data preparation; disciplinary data management workflows; high-energy physics; humanities-and-social sciences; library and information science; metadata; persistent identifier assignment; research data; research datasets; scholarly communication; transdisciplinary service design; transdisciplinary service implementation; Communities; Data models; Information science; Interoperability; Libraries; Physics; Publishing; Conceptual models; OAIS; author identifiers; persistent identifiers; scientific data curation;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Digital Libraries (JCDL), 2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on
Conference_Location
London
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180
Filename
6970180
Link To Document