DocumentCode
1700950
Title
Comparing operating systems using robustness benchmarks
Author
Koopman, Philip ; Sung, John ; Dingman, Christopher ; Siewiorek, Daniel ; Marz, Ted
Author_Institution
Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
fYear
1997
Firstpage
72
Lastpage
79
Abstract
When creating mission-critical distributed systems using off-the-shelf components, it is important to assess the dependability of not only the hardware, but the software as well. This paper proposes a way to test operating system dependability. The concept of response regions is presented as a way to visualize erroneous system behavior and gain insight into failure mechanisms. A 5-point “CRASH” (catastrophic, restart, abort, silent, hindering) scale is defined for grading the severity of robustness vulnerabilities encountered. Test results from five operating systems are analyzed for robustness vulnerabilities, and exhibit a range of dependability. Robustness benchmarking comparisons of this type may provide important information to both users and designers of off-the-shelf software for dependable systems
Keywords
network operating systems; software reliability; CRASH scale; erroneous system behavior visualization; failure mechanisms; mission-critical distributed systems; off-the-shelf components; operating systems; response regions; robustness benchmarks; robustness vulnerability severity grading; software dependability assessment; Benchmark testing; Failure analysis; Hardware; Mission critical systems; Operating systems; Robustness; Software design; Software systems; System testing; Visualization;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Reliable Distributed Systems, 1997. Proceedings., The Sixteenth Symposium on
Conference_Location
Durham, NC
ISSN
1060-9857
Print_ISBN
0-8186-8177-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/RELDIS.1997.632800
Filename
632800
Link To Document