• DocumentCode
    171607
  • Title

    Optimization of a biomimetic model for tooth regeneration

  • Author

    Smith, Elizabeth E. ; Yelick, Pamela C. ; Khademhosseini, Ali

  • Author_Institution
    Sackler Sch. of Grad. Biomed. Sci. & Sch. of Dental Med., Tufts Univ., Boston, MA, USA
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    25-27 April 2014
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    2
  • Abstract
    Our goal is to create biomimetic three-dimensional (3D) tooth constructs as novel regenerative tools and models for bioengineered replacement teeth in humans. We use natural tooth development as a template to guide our biomimetic design, aiming to overcome disadvantages of artificial dental implants. Our biomimetic 3D tooth models are designed to facilitate the reciprocal interactions between the dental epithelium (DE) and dental mesenchyme (DM) that are required for dental cell differentiation and mineralized tooth formation. In this study we utilized tunable Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel as a scaffold material for dental cell encapsulation. We hypothesized that GelMA formulas could be optimized to closely resemble the physiological properties of the natural tooth bud environment, thus facilitating bioengineered tooth formation. To test this, atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure the elasticity of dental cell seeded GelMA constructs of three hydrogel formulas in order to identify those most closely resembling natural tooth bud tissues. Analysis of in vitro cultured DE/DM encapsulated GelMA constructs using bright field microscopy, metabolic assays, histology and immunofluorescent histochemisty, revealed distinct DE and DM cell behaviors in each GelMA formula. Subcutaneous implantation of dental cell seeded bilayered GelMA constructs resulted in mineralized tissue formation. We conclude that GelMA hydrogel formulas support dental cell differentiation, validating GelMA as a suitable platform for further development of a biomimetic tooth model.
  • Keywords
    bio-inspired materials; biochemistry; biological tissues; biomedical engineering; biomedical optical imaging; biomimetics; biomineralisation; cellular biophysics; dentistry; encapsulation; fluorescence; hydrogels; materials preparation; optical microscopy; prosthetics; spectrochemical analysis; AFM; DE cell behavior; DE/DM encapsulation; DM cell behavior; GelMA hydrogel formula optimization; artificial dental implant disadvantage; atomic force microscopy; biomimetic 3D tooth model design; biomimetic design; biomimetic model optimization; biomimetic three-dimensional tooth construct; biomimetic tooth model development; bright field microscopy; dental cell differentiation; dental cell elasticity measurementy; dental cell encapsulation; dental cell seeding; dental epithelium-dental mesenchyme reciprocal interaction; histology; immunofluorescent histochemisty; in vitro GelMA construct culture analysis; metabolic assay; mineralized tissue formation; mineralized tooth formation; natural tooth bud environment physiological properties; natural tooth bud tissue; natural tooth development; regenerative tool; replacement teeth bioengineering; replacement teeth model; scaffold material; subcutaneous bilayered GelMA construct implantation; tooth formation bioengineering; tooth regeneration; tunable gelatin methacrylate hydrogel; Biological system modeling; Dentistry; Educational institutions; Implants; In vitro; Teeth; Three-dimensional displays; biomimetic model; hydrogel; mineralization; tooth tissue bioengineering;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Bioengineering Conference (NEBEC), 2014 40th Annual Northeast
  • Conference_Location
    Boston, MA
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NEBEC.2014.6972943
  • Filename
    6972943