DocumentCode :
1758452
Title :
The "X-Engineer": Engineering Reflexivity and Identity Formation [Opinion]
Author :
Sakellariou, N.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Environ. Sci., Policy, & Manage., Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
fYear :
2013
fDate :
Spring 2013
Firstpage :
25
Lastpage :
27
Abstract :
The author states that in conditions of perceived technology crisis, engineers contextualize themselves and the contents of their work. This is similar to, but not quite the same as Thomas Kuhn´s assertion that “in periods of acknowledged crisis, scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their fields”. Kuhn was referring to internal crises; specifically, those involving elite communities of a handful of practitioners confronting the deadlock of a certain scientific “paradigm.” In contrast, technology crises and engineering reflexivity are mostly due to “external” (i.e., non-engineering) influences. Engineering education is a key locus for engineers to re-contextualize themselves and the type of work they perform.
Keywords :
engineering education; engineering education; engineering identity formation; engineering reflexivity; perceived technology crisis; philosophical analysis; scientific paradigm; x-engineer;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0278-0097
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MTS.2013.2249373
Filename :
6479440
Link To Document :
بازگشت