• DocumentCode
    1758868
  • Title

    Error Propagation Analysis in Three-Dimensional Coseismic Displacement Inversion

  • Author

    Bin Liu ; Jingfa Zhang ; Yi Luo ; Wenliang Jiang ; Xi Chen ; Yongsheng Li

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Adm., Beijing, China
  • Volume
    11
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Nov. 2014
  • Firstpage
    1971
  • Lastpage
    1975
  • Abstract
    Using the Bam earthquake as an example, we apply the multiple-aperture interferometry (MAI) algorithm to measure the azimuth (AZI) displacement with multiple mode synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images (ScanSAR and image modes) and further on produce the 3-D coseismic displacement maps using well-known models: multiple independent interferometric SAR (InSAR) with different viewing angles and combining MAI with conventional InSAR. The 3-D displacement maps show that, besides accuracy of SAR observation, inversion model is another major perturbing factor limiting the accuracy of 3-D component reconstruction. That is, in the former model, the smaller the difference of incidence angles is, the more easily influenced by ill-conditioned systems the estimated parameters are. Based on characteristics of error sources of SAR observations, we classify observation errors into random error, systematic error, and gross error. Moreover, their characteristics of error propagation are analyzed in the two models, respectively. Error propagation analysis indicates that random errors only affect variability of inversion result, while systematic error and gross error cause not only variability but also bias or uncertainty in estimated parameters. The presented error analysis method provides a more comprehensive understanding of bias or uncertainty of 3-D estimated components, which will be a useful tool for evaluating errors in displacement fields obtained from SAR observations. In this letter, we also group multiple InSAR and MAI observations to estimate 3-D components using weighted least squares whose weights are given by the Förstner posterior variance estimation, which may avoid an ill-conditioned system, reducing line-of-sight and AZI random noises and improving accuracies of estimated 3-D components.
  • Keywords
    earthquakes; inverse problems; radar imaging; radar interferometry; random noise; seismology; synthetic aperture radar; terrain mapping; 3D component reconstruction; 3D coseismic displacement inversion; 3D coseismic displacement map; AZI displacement measurement; AZI random noise; Bam earthquake; Forstner posterior variance estimation; InSAR; MAI algorithm; SAR observation error sources; ScanSAR; azimuth displacement measurement; error evaluation; error propagation analysis; gross error; image mode; incidence angle; inversion model; multiple independent interferometric SAR; multiple mode SAR images; multiple mode synthetic aperture radar images; multiple-aperture interferometry algorithm; observation error classification; parameter estimation; random error; systematic error; viewing angle; weighted least squares; Analytical models; Earthquakes; Estimation; Seismic measurements; Solid modeling; Synthetic aperture radar; Systematics; 3-D coseismic displacement; Error propagation analysis; interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR); multiple-aperture interferometry (MAI); posterior variance estimation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1545-598X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/LGRS.2014.2315815
  • Filename
    6805591