• DocumentCode
    1762645
  • Title

    Correction of Reflectance Anisotropy Effects of Vegetation on Airborne Spectroscopy Data and Derived Products

  • Author

    Weyermann, Jorg ; Damm, Alexander ; Kneubuhler, Mathias ; Schaepman, Michael E.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Geogr., Univ. of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Volume
    52
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Jan. 2014
  • Firstpage
    616
  • Lastpage
    627
  • Abstract
    Directional effects in airborne imaging spectrometer (IS) data are mainly caused by anisotropic reflectance behavior of surfaces, commonly described by bi-directional reflectance distribution functions (BRDF). The radiometric and spectral accuracy of IS data is known to be highly influenced by such effects, which prevents consistent comparison of products. Several models were developed to approximate surface reflectance anisotropy for multi-angular observations. Few studies were carried out using such models for airborne flight lines where only a single observation is available for each ground location. In the present work, we quantified and corrected reflectance anisotropy on a single airborne HyMap flight line using a Ross-Li model. We stratified the surface in two vegetation structural types (different in vertical structuring) using spectral angle mapping, to generate a structure dependent set of angular observations. We then derived a suite of products [indices (structure insensitive pigment index, normalized difference vegetation index, simple ratio index, and anthocyanin reflectance index) and inversion-based (SAIL/PROSPECT-leaf area index, Cw, Cdm, Cab)] from corrected and uncorrected images. Non-parametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) showed throughout significant improvements in products from corrected images. Data correction resulting in airborne nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance (aNBAR) showed uncertainty reductions from 60 to 100% (p-value = 0.05) as compared to uncorrected and nadir observations. Using sparse IS data acquisitions, the use of fully parametrized BRDF models is limited. Our normalization scheme is straightforward and can be applied with illumination and observation geometry being the only a priori information. We recommend aNBAR generation to precede any higher level airborne IS product generation based on reflectance data.
  • Keywords
    reflectivity; spectrometers; vegetation; vegetation mapping; Kruskal-Wallis test; Ross-Li model; aNBAR; airborne flight lines; airborne imaging spectrometer data; airborne nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance; airborne spectroscopy data; anisotropic reflectance behavior; bi-directional reflectance distribution functions; data correction; derived products; directional effects; ground location; multiangular observations; nonparametric analysis of variance; normalization scheme; radiometric accuracy; reflectance anisotropy effects correction; reflectance data; single airborne HyMap flight line; sparse IS data acquisitions; spectral accuracy; spectral angle mapping; surface reflectance anisotropy; vegetation structural types; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Atmospheric modeling; Indexes; Kernel; Scattering; Uncertainty; Vegetation mapping; Airborne imaging spectroscopy; HyMap; PROSPECT/SAIL; Ross–Li; bi-directional reflectance distribution functions (BRDF); directional effects; pre-processing; reflectance anisotropy;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2013.2242898
  • Filename
    6482193