Evaluation of IEM, Dubois, and Oh Radar Backscatter Models Using Airborne L-Band SAR

The backscatter predicted by three common surface scattering models (the Integral Equation Model (IEM), the Dubois, and the Oh models) was evaluated against fully polarized L-band airborne observations. Before any site-specific calibration, the Oh model was found to be the most accurate among the three, with mean errors between the simulated and the observed backscatter of 1.2 dB ( ±2.6 dB standard deviation of the error) and -0.4 dB ( ±2.4 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively, while the IEM and Dubois presented larger errors, with a maximum of 4.5 dB ( ±2 dB) for the IEM in VV polarization. The backscatter errors were observed to be related to surface roughness, another major factor determining the electromagnetic scattering at the soil surface. An existing semiempirical calibration of the surface roughness correlation length was therefore applied to improve the mismatch between modeled and observed backscatters. The application of the semiempirical calibration led to a significant improvement of the backscatter prediction for the IEM. After calibration, the IEM outperformed the Oh model, resulting in a mean backscatter error of -0.3 dB ( ±1.1 dB) and -0.2 ( ±1.2 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively. To test the robustness of the semiempirical calibration, calibration functions derived from an independent data set were applied and shown to also improve the (uncalibrated) IEM performance, suggesting that the calibration procedure is relatively robust for global application.