• DocumentCode
    1765289
  • Title

    Multiobjective Optimization and Comparison of Nonsingleton Type-1 and Singleton Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems

  • Author

    Cara, A.B. ; Wagner, Christoph ; Hagras, Hani ; Pomares, H. ; Rojas, I.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Archit. & Comput. Technol., Univ. of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Volume
    21
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    41426
  • Firstpage
    459
  • Lastpage
    476
  • Abstract
    Singleton interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) have been widely applied in several real-world applications, where it was shown that the singleton interval type-2 FLSs outperform their singleton type-1 counterparts in applications with high uncertainty levels. However, one of the main criticisms of singleton interval type-2 FLSs is the fact that they outperform singleton type-1 FLSs solely based on their use of extra degrees of freedom (extra parameters) and that type-1 FLSs with a sufficiently large number of parameters may provide the same performance as interval type-2 FLSs. In addition, most works on type-2 FLSs only compare their results with singleton type-1 FLSs but fail to consider nonsingleton type-1 systems. In this paper, we aim to directly address and investigate this criticism. In order to do so, we will perform a comparative study between optimized singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs under the presence of noise. We will also present a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) for the optimization of singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 fuzzy systems for function approximation problems. The MOEA will aim to satisfy two objectives to maximize the accuracy of the FLS and minimize the number of rules in the FLS, thus improving its interpretability. Furthermore, we will present a methodology to obtain “optimal” consequents for the FLSs. Hence, this paper has two main contributions: First, it provides a common methodology to learn the three types of FLSs (i.e., singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs) from data samples. The second contribution is the creation of a common framework for the comparison of type-1 and type-2 FLSs that allows us to address the aforementioned criticism. We provide details of a series of experiments and include statistical analysis showing that the type-2 FLS is able to handle higher levels of noise than i- s nonsingleton and singleton type-1 counterparts.
  • Keywords
    evolutionary computation; fuzzy logic; fuzzy systems; optimisation; statistical analysis; MOEA; function approximation problems; multiobjective evolutionary algorithm; multiobjective optimization; nonsingleton type-1 FLS; nonsingleton type-1 fuzzy logic systems; optimized singleton type-1; singleton interval type-2 FLS; singleton interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems; singleton type-1 FLS; singleton type-1 fuzzy systems; statistical analysis; Accuracy; Biological cells; Fuzzy systems; Noise; Optimization; Standards; Uncertainty; Multiobjective optimization; nonsingleton fuzzy logic systems (FLSs); type-2 fuzzy logic systems;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1063-6706
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2236096
  • Filename
    6392248