DocumentCode
1776816
Title
Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation
Author
Carroll, John ; McDonald, Andrew ; McMillan, David
Author_Institution
Univ. of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
fYear
2014
fDate
24-25 Sept. 2014
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
Modern wind turbines vary greatly in their drive train configurations. With the variety of options available it can be difficult to determine which type is most suitable for on and offshore applications. A large percentage of modern drive trains consist of either doubly fed induction generators with partially rated converters or permanent magnet generators with fully rated converters. These configurations were the focus of this empirical reliability comparison. The turbine population for the analysis contained over 1800 doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) turbines and 400 permanent magnet generator (PMG) fully rated converter (FRC) turbines. The findings of this analysis show that, due to the poorer reliability of the FRC, the DFIG configuration proved the most reliable.
Keywords
asynchronous generators; offshore installations; permanent magnet generators; power convertors; wind turbines; DFIG drive train configuration; FRC; PMG drive train configuration; PMG fully rated converter turbines; doubly fed induction generators; empirical reliability comparison; offshore applications; partially rated converters; permanent magnet generators; wind turbines; DFIG; Failure Rate; PMG FRC; Reliability;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
iet
Conference_Titel
Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014), 3rd
Conference_Location
Naples
Type
conf
DOI
10.1049/cp.2014.0908
Filename
6993301
Link To Document