• DocumentCode
    1776816
  • Title

    Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation

  • Author

    Carroll, John ; McDonald, Andrew ; McMillan, David

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    24-25 Sept. 2014
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    Modern wind turbines vary greatly in their drive train configurations. With the variety of options available it can be difficult to determine which type is most suitable for on and offshore applications. A large percentage of modern drive trains consist of either doubly fed induction generators with partially rated converters or permanent magnet generators with fully rated converters. These configurations were the focus of this empirical reliability comparison. The turbine population for the analysis contained over 1800 doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) turbines and 400 permanent magnet generator (PMG) fully rated converter (FRC) turbines. The findings of this analysis show that, due to the poorer reliability of the FRC, the DFIG configuration proved the most reliable.
  • Keywords
    asynchronous generators; offshore installations; permanent magnet generators; power convertors; wind turbines; DFIG drive train configuration; FRC; PMG drive train configuration; PMG fully rated converter turbines; doubly fed induction generators; empirical reliability comparison; offshore applications; partially rated converters; permanent magnet generators; wind turbines; DFIG; Failure Rate; PMG FRC; Reliability;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    iet
  • Conference_Titel
    Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014), 3rd
  • Conference_Location
    Naples
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1049/cp.2014.0908
  • Filename
    6993301