DocumentCode :
178533
Title :
A comparison of x-lets in denoising cDNA microarray images
Author :
Shams, Reza ; Rabbani, Hossein ; Gazor, S.
Author_Institution :
Electr. & Comput. Eng. Dept., Isfahan Univ. of Technol., Isfahan, Iran
fYear :
2014
fDate :
4-9 May 2014
Firstpage :
2843
Lastpage :
2847
Abstract :
Microarray technology has become a power tool in the field of bioinformatics. It is used to measure gene expression levels and similar to any other image capturing processes is prone to noise. There are different kinds of noise, during preparation, hybridization and scanning in microarray images which usually are modeled by Gaussian noise. Since introduction of wavelets in 1970s, many more forms and extensions of this transform have been developed and used, such as stationary wavelet transform (SWT), complex wavelet transform (CWT), curvelet transform (CURV) and contourlet transform (CNT). By developing of more sparse transforms, it is important to have a perspective of how efficient the transforms are in different applications, such as microarray image analysis. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of common sparse transforms including ordinary discrete wavelet transform (DWT), SWT, CWT, CURV, CNT, Contourlet-SD decomposition, steerable pyramid (STP) and shearlet transform (SHR) for microarray image denoising. Therefore after converting microarray image into x-let transform, BayesShrink method, soft and hard thresholding are used to perform denoising of these images. Both local and general thresholds are calculated for each subband in order to evaluate the effect of incorporating intrascale dependency on top of sparsity property in statistical modeling of x-let´s coefficients. Our simulation results show that CWT and SHR outperforms the others when using global thresholding and SWT is the preferred transform when using local thresholding. Although STP and SHR have better performance for some criteria like structural similarity (SSIM) index, but CWT is faster.
Keywords :
bioinformatics; curvelet transforms; discrete wavelet transforms; image denoising; lab-on-a-chip; BayesShrink method; CNT; CURV; CWT; DWT; Gaussian noise; SHR; SSIM index; STP; SWT; bioinformatics; cDNA microarray image denoising; complex wavelet transform; contourlet transform; contourlet-SD decomposition; curvelet transform; gene expression levels; global thresholding; hard thresholding; image capturing processes; intrascale dependency; local thresholding; microarray image analysis; microarray technology; ordinary discrete wavelet transform; shearlet transform; soft thresholding; sparse transforms; stationary wavelet transform; statistical modeling; steerable pyramid; structural similarity index; x-let coefficients; x-let transform; Continuous wavelet transforms; Discrete wavelet transforms; Noise reduction; PSNR; denoising; microarray; transform; wavelet; x-let;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Florence
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854119
Filename :
6854119
Link To Document :
بازگشت