Title :
Effects of electrode configurations in transcranial direct current stimulation after stroke
Author :
Chelette, Kenneth ; Carrico, Cheryl ; Nichols, Laurie ; Salyers, Emily ; Sawaki, Lumy
Author_Institution :
Phys. Med. & Rehabilitation, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Abstract :
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can modulate neuroplasticity (the capacity for brain reorganization). Neuroplastic change correlates with upper extremity (UE) recovery after brain lesions. Different electrode configurations of tDCS paired with UE motor training can have different effects in distinct populations. We are conducting the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate which tDCS configuration may best enhance outcomes of UE motor training for stroke survivors with chronic, severe hemiparesis (i.e., little or no wrist or hand movement). We have assigned subjects to 1 of 4 groups: 1) “Anodal”: anodal tDCS to excite ipsilesional motor cortex; 2) “Cathodal”: cathodal tDCS to inhibit contralesional motor cortex; 3) “Dual”: a simultaneous combination of anodal and cathodal tDCS; or 4) “Sham” tDCS. Intervention (10 sessions) consists of tDCS followed by 3 hours of intensive, task-oriented UE training in each session. Our primary outcome measure is Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Our secondary outcome measures are Action Research Arm Test and Stroke Impact Scale. We have conducted evaluations at baseline and post-intervention. Preliminary results from 26 of (projected) 44 subjects indicate substantially greater improvement for the “Cathodal” group than other groups. These findings differ from evidence about tDCS in rehabilitation of mild-to-moderate hemiparesis. Completion of our study will include full analysis of neuroplastic change associated with intervention.
Keywords :
bioelectric phenomena; biomedical electrodes; brain; medical disorders; neurophysiology; patient rehabilitation; Action Research Arm Test and Stroke Impact Scale; Cathodal group; Fugl-Meyer Assessment; ShamtDCS; UE motor training; anodal tDCS; baseline; brain lesions; brain reorganization; cathodal tDCS; chronic hemiparesis; contralesional motor cortex; double-blind trial; electrode configuration; full analysis; intensive UE training; ipsilesional motor cortex; mild-to-moderate hemiparesis rehabilitation; neuroplastic change; neuroplasticity modulation; noninvasive brain stimulation; placebo-controlled trial; post-intervention; randomized trial; secondary outcome measures; severe hemiparesis; stroke survivors; tDCS configuration; task-oriented UE training; time 3 h; transcranial direct current stimulation; upper extremity recovery; Brain stimulation; DC motors; Electrodes; Neuroplasticity; Neuroscience; Training; hemiparesis; motor function; neuromodulation; neuroplasticity; occupational therapy;
Conference_Titel :
e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Natal
DOI :
10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001806