Title :
Assuring ground-based detect and avoid for UAS operations
Author :
Denney, Ewen ; Pai, Ganesh ; Berthold, Randall ; Fladeland, Matthew ; Storms, Bruce ; Sumich, Mark
Author_Institution :
Ames Res. Center, NASA, Moffett Field, CA, USA
Abstract :
One of the goals of the Marginal Ice Zones Observations and Processes Experiment (MIZOPEX) NASA Earth science mission was to show the operational capabilities of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) when deployed on challenging missions, in difficult environments. Given the extreme conditions of the Arctic environment where MIZOPEX measurements were required, the mission opted to use a radar to provide a ground-based detect-and-avoid (GBDAA) capability as an alternate means of compliance (AMOC) with the see-and-avoid federal aviation regulation. This paper describes how GBDAA safety assurance was provided by interpreting and applying the guidelines in the national policy for UAS operational approval. In particular, we describe how we formulated the appropriate safety goals, defined the processes and procedures for system safety, identified and assembled the relevant safety verification evidence, and created an operational safety case in compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements. To the best of our knowledge, the safety case, which was ultimately approved by the FAA, is the first successful example of non-military UAS operations using GBDAA in the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS), and, therefore, the first nonmilitary application of the safety case concept in this context.
Keywords :
aerospace computing; air safety; autonomous aerial vehicles; Arctic environment; Federal Aviation Administration requirements; GBDAA safety assurance; MIZOPEX measurements; Marginal Ice Zones Observations and Processes Experiment NASA Earth science mission; U.S. National Airspace System; UAS operational approval; alternate means of compliance; extreme conditions; ground-based detect-and-avoid capability; national policy; nonmilitary UAS operations; nonmilitary application; operational capabilities; operational safety case; safety goals; safety verification evidence; see-and-avoid federal aviation regulation; system safety; unmanned aircraft systems; Airborne radar; Aircraft; FAA; Hazards; Radar detection;
Conference_Titel :
Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd
Conference_Location :
Colorado Springs, CO
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4799-5002-7
DOI :
10.1109/DASC.2014.6979492