DocumentCode :
1819320
Title :
To bite or not to bite-a study of tail bits versus tail-biting
Author :
Wang, Yi-Pin Eric ; Ramésh, R.
Author_Institution :
Ericsson Inc., NC, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
1996
fDate :
15-18 Oct 1996
Firstpage :
317
Abstract :
Tail bits and tail-biting are the two commonly used methods for terminating the trellis of convolutional codes. In this paper, we evaluate the relative performance of these two options by comparing their performance in a variety of cases. Suboptimal decoding algorithms for the tail-biting case are proposed. Puncturing is proposed as an alternative method to prevent the rate loss when tail bits are used. The performance of several puncturing schemes are evaluated. In addition, we explore the bit error rate of these schemes as a function of position of bits in a block
Keywords :
Viterbi decoding; convolutional codes; digital communication; error statistics; maximum likelihood decoding; trellis codes; Viterbi algorithm; bit error rate; convolutional codes; maximum likelihood decoder; performance; puncturing; rate loss; relative performance; suboptimal decoding algorithms; tail bits; tail-biting; trellis termination; Bit error rate; Convolutional codes; Decoding; Digital communication; GSM; Gaussian channels; Propagation losses; Signal to noise ratio; Tail;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 1996. PIMRC'96., Seventh IEEE International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Taipei
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3692-5
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/PIMRC.1996.567407
Filename :
567407
Link To Document :
بازگشت