DocumentCode
1821354
Title
Bipolar pulse shaping revisited
Author
Fairstein, E.
Author_Institution
228 Outer Drive, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
Volume
1
fYear
1996
fDate
2-9 Nov 1996
Firstpage
512
Abstract
Compared with unipolar pulse shaping, bipolar shaping is insensitive to misadjusted or missing pole-zero cancellation, doesn´t require a baseline line restorer, and furnishes an amplitude-invariant time marker for coincidence measurements. These characteristics should be useful in amplifier arrays for integrated circuits (ASICs), despite the greater noise and resolving time. With ASIC technology in mind, unipolar and bipolar shaping methods are compared here. An item that emerged from the study is that two CR differentiators and two RC integrators are optimum from a cost-benefit viewpoint. The network can be adjusted to produce the transfer function (sin t-t) exp(-t), which has half the transmission loss and 8% shorter resolving time than the same configuration with all time constants alike
Keywords
application specific integrated circuits; bipolar analogue integrated circuits; coincidence circuits; detector circuits; nuclear electronics; pulse amplifiers; pulse shaping circuits; ASIC; CR differentiators; RC integrators; amplifier arrays; amplitude-invariant time marker; bipolar pulse shaping; coincidence measurements; integrated circuits; resolving time; transfer function; transmission loss; unipolar shaping; Application specific integrated circuits; Integrated circuit measurements; Integrated circuit noise; Integrated circuit technology; Noise cancellation; Noise shaping; Pulse amplifiers; Pulse measurements; Pulse shaping methods; Time measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Nuclear Science Symposium, 1996. Conference Record., 1996 IEEE
Conference_Location
Anaheim, CA
ISSN
1082-3654
Print_ISBN
0-7803-3534-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/NSSMIC.1996.591046
Filename
591046
Link To Document