DocumentCode :
1823252
Title :
A novel correlation tester for multicore power cable fault finding and identification using pseudonoise sequences
Author :
Geisler, H. ; Guinee, R.A.
Author_Institution :
Cork Inst. of Technol., Cork, Ireland
fYear :
2009
fDate :
1-4 Sept. 2009
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
5
Abstract :
A novel pulse tester correlation strategy, using pseudonoise (pN) sequences, is presented as an alternative to Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) for multicore power cable fault location and identification. The fulcrum of this method is the cross correlation (CCR) of the fault response echo with the input pN test excitation which results in the extraction of a unique signature for identification of the fault type, if any, or load termination present as well as its distance from the point of test stimulus injection. This fault identification procure can used in a number of essential industrial scenarios embracing overhead power lines and underground cables in inaccessible locations which rely on a pathway for power transfer and/or signal propagation. A key feature is the potential usage of Pseudorandom Binary Sequences (PRBS) for long distance fault finding over several cycles at low amplitude levels online to reject normal sinusoidal power flow, signal traffic and extraneous noise pickup for the purpose of multiple fault coverage, resolution and identification. In this paper the PRBS method of cable fault diagnosis is presented, along with a single phase transmission line model, for fault distance measurement. Key experimental test results are presented for pN fault finding using a four core steel wired armoured (SWA) copper power cable with different types of faults encountered in practice, under laboratory controlled conditions, for proof of concept. The measured CCR fault response demonstrate the effectiveness of the PRBS test method as a tool in fault type identification and location. The results obtained substantiate the accuracy of PRBS diagnostic CCR method of fault recognition and location using a range of resistive fault terminations. The accuracy of the method is further validated through theoretical calculation via estimated fault reflection coefficients and comparison with known fault resistance terminations, known apriori, and link distances in power line - experimental testing.
Keywords :
binary sequences; correlation methods; fault location; power cable testing; power overhead lines; random sequences; time-domain reflectometry; cross correlation; fault distance measurement; fault recognition method; fault response echo; multicore power cable fault identification; multiple fault coverage; overhead power lines; pN fault finding; pN test excitation; phase transmission line model; pseudorandom binary sequences; pulse tester correlation strategy; sinusoidal power flow; steel wired armoured copper power cable; test stimulus injection; time domain reflectometry; Binary sequences; Fault diagnosis; Fault location; Multicore processing; Power cables; Power overhead lines; Reflectometry; Signal processing; Testing; Underground power cables; Cable fault location estimation; Cable fault signatures; Cable trouble-shooting using pseudorandom binary sequences (PRBS); Fault finding using pseudonoise sequences; Open circuit and short circuit fault location; Power cable fault finding; Reflection coefficient and VSWR estimation; Termination fault impedance identification;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), 2009 Proceedings of the 44th International
Conference_Location :
Glasgow
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-6823-2
Type :
conf
Filename :
5429575
Link To Document :
بازگشت