Title :
Optimal Orientations and Locations of Actuators and Sensors for Structural Shape Control, Using Intelligent Algorithms
Author :
Jingyu Yang ; Guoping Chen
Author_Institution :
State Key Lab. of Mech. & Control for Mech. Struct., Nanjing Univ. of Aeronaut. & Astronaut., Nanjing, China
Abstract :
Optimal design of the orientations and locations of collocated piezoelectric actuators/sensors pairs for a plate-like structure under bending load uncertainty are determined with the objective of minimizing the deflection and electrical input under any sort of loading. The bending moments generated by the piezoelectric actuator actuators are used for deflection control, i.e., to minimize the deflection. The plate-like structure is subjected to an arbitrary load which lies in an uncertainty domain with regard to its magnitude and direction. The uncertain loading studied in the present paper involves a load of unknown magnitude and direction, which should be determined to produce the arbitrary deflection. Two optimization variables are considered for each piezoelectric actuator/sensor device: the location of its center and its orientation. An optimal control algorithm and three types of artificial intelligence algorithms (AISOOL algorithm--Artificial Immune Systems for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, ACOPSOOOL algorithm--ACO and PSO for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, HTOOL algorithm--Hop field-Tank for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, optimal control algorithm) are presented for the determination of the orientation and location of piezoelectric actuators/sensors in the application to shape control of plate-like structures. Numerical results show that simultaneous optimization of both orientations and locations can lead to optimum configurations that consume less electrical energy and minimizing the deflection. AISOOL algorithm can handle the optimization of orientations and locations of actuators/sensors better than ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm. The different algorithms exhibit similar performance. However, exhaustive ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm require significantly higher computational effort.
Keywords :
artificial immune systems; artificial intelligence; intelligent structures; minimisation; optimal control; piezoelectric actuators; plates (structures); sensors; shape control; structural engineering; uncertain systems; ACO and PSO for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators; ACOPSOOOL algorithm; AISOOL algorithm; HTOOL algorithm; Hop field-tank for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, optimal control algorithm; actuator optimal locations; actuator optimal orientations; artificial immune systems for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators; artificial intelligence algorithms; bending load uncertainty; bending moments; deflection control; deflection minimization; electrical input minimization; intelligent algorithms; optimal control algorithm; optimal design; optimization variables; piezoelectric actuator-sensor device; plate-like structure; sensor optimal locations; sensor optimal orientations; structural shape control; Finite element analysis; Optimization; Piezoelectric actuators; Sensors; Shape; Voltage control; Actuator/sensor; Artificial Intelligence Algorithms; Optimization; Orientations and Locations;
Conference_Titel :
Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), 2013 Fifth International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Hong Kong
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-5652-7
DOI :
10.1109/ICMTMA.2013.189