• DocumentCode
    1901424
  • Title

    Impact of assumptions on DC power flow model accuracy

  • Author

    Qi, Yingying ; Shi, Di ; Tylavsky, Daniel

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Electr. Comput. & Energy Eng., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ, USA
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    9-11 Sept. 2012
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    The industry seems to be sanguine about the performance of dc power-flow models, but recent research has shown that the performance of different formulations is highly variable. Considering their pervasive use, the accuracy of dc power-flow models is of great concern. In this paper, three dc power-flow formulations are examined: the classical dc power-flow model, dc power-flow model with loss compensation and the so-called a-matching dc power-flow model. These three models are tested in three systems of different sizes, ranging from 10 buses to 62,000 buses. By comparing the dc power-flow results with the ac power-flow results, the paper concludes that the a-matching formulation has the highest accuracy among three dc power flow formulations.
  • Keywords
    compensation; load flow; a-matching dc power-flow model; a-matching formulation; dc power flow formulations; loss compensation; Accuracy; Analytical models; Equations; Load flow; Load modeling; Mathematical model; Phase transformers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2012
  • Conference_Location
    Champaign, IL
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-2306-2
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4673-2307-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NAPS.2012.6336395
  • Filename
    6336395