• DocumentCode
    1904581
  • Title

    Competency matrix assessment in an integrated, first-year curriculum in science, engineering, and mathematics

  • Author

    Anderson, Claude W. ; Bryan, Kurt M. ; Froyd, Jeffrey E. ; Hatten, Daniel L. ; Kiaer, C. Lynn ; Moore, Noel E. ; Mueller, Michael R. ; Mottel, Edward A. ; Wagner, Jerome F.

  • Author_Institution
    Rose-Hulman Inst. of Technol., Terre Haute, IN, USA
  • Volume
    3
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    6-9 Nov 1996
  • Firstpage
    1276
  • Abstract
    The Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (IFYCSEM) at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology integrates topics in calculus, mechanics, statics, electricity and magnetism, computer science, general chemistry engineering design, and engineering graphics into a three course, 12-credit-per-quarter sequence. In 1995-96, faculty teaching IFYCSEM decided to move toward a competency matrix assessment approach. Using a competency matrix, faculty establish a 2D grid. Along the vertical dimension of the grid, faculty list the topics and techniques with which they believe students should become facile. Along the horizontal dimension are the levels of learning according to the taxonomy: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation. For each topic in the vertical dimension, faculty establish the desired level of learning associated with a grade: A, B or C. For each quarter in 1995-96, the resulting matrix contained about 500-600 elements or blocks. When a student has demonstrated a level of learning for a particular topic, the student marks the block as earned and enters in the competency matrix a reference to his/her portfolio showing where the supporting document may be found. Students maintain their own portfolios and competency matrices and at the end of each quarter students submit their competency matrix along with a portfolio as documentation. Faculty assign a grade based on the competency matrix. We present descriptions of the rationale and process and discuss advantages and disadvantages, including feedback from both faculty and students
  • Keywords
    chemistry; computer science education; design engineering; educational courses; engineering education; human factors; mathematics; teaching; 2D grid; IFYCSEM; calculus; chemistry engineering design; competency matrix assessment; computer science; desired learning level; electricity; engineering graphics; faculty; feedback; mechanics; portfolio; statics; Calculus; Chemical technology; Chemistry; Computer graphics; Computer science; Design engineering; Education; Mathematics; Portfolios; Taxonomy;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE '96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of
  • Conference_Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
  • ISSN
    0190-5848
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3348-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FIE.1996.567858
  • Filename
    567858