• DocumentCode
    1913834
  • Title

    Hyperspectral anomaly detection: A comparative evaluation of methods

  • Author

    Borghys, D. ; Achard, V. ; Rotman, S.R. ; Gorelik, N. ; Perneel, C. ; Schweicher, E.

  • Author_Institution
    Signal & Image Centre, R. Mil. Acad., Brussels, Belgium
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    13-20 Aug. 2011
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Anomaly detection in hyperspectral data has received a lot of attention for various applications. The aim of anomaly detection is to detect pixels in the hyperspectral datacube whose spectra differ significantly from the background spectra. In anomaly detection no prior knowledge about the target is assumed. Anomaly detection methods in general estimate the spectra of the background (locally or globally) and then detect anomalies as pixels with a large spectral distance w.r.t. the determined background spectra. Many types of anomaly detectors have been proposed in literature, each depending on several parameters. The aim of this paper is to compare the results of different types of anomaly detection when they are applied to scenes with different complexity: urban scenes with different complexity and rural scenes with sub-pixel anomalies. This paper only considers hyperspectral data in the VNIR and SWIR part of the EM spectrum (λ = 0.4-2.5μm).
  • Keywords
    covariance matrices; image segmentation; EM spectrum; SWIR; VNIR; hyperspectral anomaly detection; hyperspectral data; rural scenes; urban scenes; Complexity theory; Computer aided manufacturing; Covariance matrix; Detectors; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Hyperspectral imaging; Image segmentation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 2011 XXXth URSI
  • Conference_Location
    Istanbul
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-5117-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/URSIGASS.2011.6050650
  • Filename
    6050650