• DocumentCode
    19220
  • Title

    Optimal Permanent-Magnet Geometries for Dipole Field Approximation

  • Author

    Petruska, Andrew J. ; Abbott, Jake J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng., Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Volume
    49
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Feb. 2013
  • Firstpage
    811
  • Lastpage
    819
  • Abstract
    The dipole approximation for magnetic fields has become a common simplifying assumption in magnetic-manipulation research when dealing with permanent magnets because the approximation provides convenient analytical properties that are a good fit at large distances. What is meant by “good fit at large distances” is generally not quantified in the literature. By using a parameterized multipole expansion and collaborating finite-element analysis (FEA) simulations to represent the magnet´s field, we quantify the error associated with the dipole approximation as a function of distance from the permanent magnet. Using this expression, we find cylindrical, washer, and rectangular-cross-section bar permanent-magnet aspect ratios that minimize the error of the dipole approximation. For cylinders and rectangular-cross-section bars, these aspect ratios are a diameter-to-length ratio of √{4/3} and a cube, respectively.
  • Keywords
    error analysis; finite element analysis; magnetostatics; permanent magnets; FEA; aspect ratios; cylindrical cross section bar; diameter-to-length ratio; dipole field approximation; distance function; error; finite element analysis simulations; good fit at large distances; magnetic manipulation research; multipole expansion; permanent magnet geometries; rectangular-cross section bar permanent magnet; washer cross section bar; Approximation methods; Geometry; Magnetic moments; Magnetic susceptibility; Magnetization; Permanent magnets; Shape; Magnetic analysis; magnetostatics; permanent magnets;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.2012.2205014
  • Filename
    6220256