• DocumentCode
    1924055
  • Title

    Brushless AC interior-permanent magnet motor design: Comparison of slot/pole combinations and distributed vs. concentrated windings

  • Author

    Goss, James ; Staton, David ; Wrobel, Rafal ; Mellor, Phil

  • Author_Institution
    Motor Design Ltd., Ellesmere, UK
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    15-19 Sept. 2013
  • Firstpage
    1213
  • Lastpage
    1219
  • Abstract
    This paper compares the attributes of 36 slot, 33 slot and 12 slot brushless interior permanent magnet motor designs, each with an identical 10 pole interior magnet rotor. The aim of the paper is to quantify the trade-offs between alternative distributed and concentrated winding configurations taking into account aspects such as thermal performance, field weakening behaviour, acoustic noise, and efficiency. It is found that the concentrated 12 slot design gives the highest theoretical performance however significant rotor losses are found during testing and a large amount of acoustic noise and vibration is generated. The 33 slot design is found to have marginally better performance than the 36 slot but it also generates some unbalanced magnetic pull on the rotor which may lead to mechanical issues at higher speeds.
  • Keywords
    acoustic noise; brushless machines; losses; machine testing; machine windings; permanent magnet motors; vibrations; acoustic noise; brushless AC interior-permanent magnet motor design; concentrated winding configuration; distributed winding configuration; field weakening behaviour; rotor loss; slot-pole combination; thermal performance; unbalanced magnetic pull; vibration; Iron; Loss measurement; Rotors; Stators; Temperature measurement; Torque; Windings;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2013 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Denver, CO
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646843
  • Filename
    6646843