• DocumentCode
    1941366
  • Title

    Image quality and noise evaluation

  • Author

    Fah, Chang Yun ; Rijal, Omar Mohd ; Noor, Norliza Mohd

  • Author_Institution
    Fac. of Eng., Multimedia Univ., Cyberjaya, Malaysia
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    1-4 July 2003
  • Firstpage
    465
  • Abstract
    The definition of a ´good image´ is subjective and depends on the requirements of a given application Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E. (1992). For example, image quality is highly connected to the process of image sampling and data compression. Noise can be generated and added in during both processes, plus it can also be generated if further processing is imposed on the image such as brightness enhancement or contrast stretch. The common practice is to evaluate the quality of the image visually. This is a subjective process since noise cannot be measured accurately Parker, J. R. (1997). In this paper, we propose using the coefficient of determination for the unreplicated linear functional relationship (ULFR) model, namely R2F as a measure of the similarity between two images which in turn may be used as a definition for image quality Dolby G. R. (1976), Fuller, W. A. (1987). The derivation of R2F is briefly reviewed. This study shows that the proposed similarity measure performs better than particular similarity measures Dietrich et al. (2002).
  • Keywords
    image processing; noise; coefficient of determination; image quality; noise evaluation; unreplicated linear functional relationship model; Data compression; Digital images; Filtering; Image analysis; Image quality; Image sampling; NIST; Noise measurement; Particle measurements; Performance evaluation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Signal Processing and Its Applications, 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Symposium on
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7946-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISSPA.2003.1224740
  • Filename
    1224740