• DocumentCode
    1960851
  • Title

    Comparison of different RDC techniques

  • Author

    Nemec, Mitja ; Ambrozic, Vanja

  • Author_Institution
    Fac. of Electr. Eng., Univ. of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    24-26 June 2015
  • Firstpage
    373
  • Lastpage
    377
  • Abstract
    The article presents various techniques for resolver to digital signal conversion. The methods are briefly described and their disadvantages and advantages are stated. The simulations are performed to evaluate the presented methods. Their performance under transient and steady state is evaluated. Further analysis was done to evaluate the techniques under real world conditions when the resolver signals differ from their ideal waveforms. Noise, offset and gain imbalance were added. The best performing method is classical tracking technique, while the worst is the simplest under-sampling technique.
  • Keywords
    data conversion; signal sampling; transients; RDC techniques; digital signal conversion; resolver signal; resolver to digital conversion; steady state; transient state; under-sampling technique; Finite impulse response filters; Phase locked loops; Rotors; Shafts; Signal resolution; Steady-state; Transient response; phase-locked loops (PLLs); resolver; resolver-to-digital conversion; tracking; under-sampling;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE), 2015 9th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Costa da Caparica
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CPE.2015.7231104
  • Filename
    7231104