DocumentCode
1992128
Title
Why evaluating CASE environments is different from evaluating CASE tools
Author
Brown, Alan W.
Author_Institution
Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
fYear
1994
fDate
7-9 Jun 1994
Firstpage
4
Lastpage
13
Abstract
Many people believe that evaluating and selecting CASE environments is little more than evaluating and selecting each of the constituent CASE tools. We argue that evaluation of CASE environments requires the consideration of a range of different factors that are fundamental to any CASE environment assessment process. We describe our rationale for this position, highlight some issues that must be considered when evaluating CASE environments, and consider how these issues affect the criteria and process of evaluating and selecting CASE environments. In particular we discuss the possibility of developing a CASE environment evaluation process based on an analysis of the quality attributes of a CASE environment
Keywords
DP management; programming environments; software selection; software tools; CASE environment evaluation; CASE environments; CASE tools; quality attributes; Application software; Assembly; Computer aided software engineering; Market opportunities; Programming; Software engineering; Software maintenance; Software systems; Software tools; Writing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Assessment of Quality Software Development Tools, 1994, Proceedings., Third Symposium on
Conference_Location
Washington, DC
Print_ISBN
0-8186-5660-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/AQSDT.1994.315764
Filename
315764
Link To Document