DocumentCode
1996265
Title
The financial impact of compressed air projects
Author
Aller, Mike ; Stinson, David ; Edwards, Paul
Author_Institution
Rinker Mater., West Palm Beach, FL
fYear
2006
fDate
9-14 April 2006
Abstract
Hundreds of thousands of dollars. That´s the excess cost many cement companies pay because their decision-making process for compressed air is antiquated and inefficient. That impacts the bottom line in three areas, annual operating cost, productivity issues and excessive capital spending. Rinker Materials and Lafarge, North America had all the classic symptoms of a company spending too much money on compressed air. By changing their business processes towards air, several nagging productivity problems were eliminated and the companies have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in operating costs. In addition, several compressors have been turned off while creating stable air pressure and quality throughout the plant. The organization now has a deeper and broader understanding of the air system and how it impacts our bottom line. And it both cases, this was accomplished as a return on investment project
Keywords
cement industry; compressed air systems; compressors; cost reduction; decision making; investment; Lafarge; Rinker Materials; annual operating costs reduction; cement companies; compressed air projects; decision-making process; excessive capital spending; financial impact; return on investment project; Building materials; Companies; Compressors; Costs; Engineering management; Investments; North America; Production; Productivity; Project management;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Cement Industry Technical Conference, 2006. Conference Record. IEEE
Conference_Location
Phoenix, AZ
Print_ISBN
1-4244-0372-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CITCON.2006.1635715
Filename
1635715
Link To Document