DocumentCode :
2008561
Title :
Comparing Rule-Based Policies
Author :
Bonatti, P.A. ; Mogavero, F.
Author_Institution :
Univ. di Napoli Federico II, Naples
fYear :
2008
fDate :
2-4 June 2008
Firstpage :
11
Lastpage :
18
Abstract :
Policy comparison is useful for a variety of applications, including policy validation and policy-aware service selection. While policy comparison is somewhat natural for policy languages based on description logics, it becomes rather difficult for rule-based policies. When policies have recursive rules, the problem is in general undecidable. Still most policies require some form of recursion to model - say - subject and object hierarchies, and certificate chains. In this paper, we show how policies with recursion can be compared by adapting query optimization techniques developed for the relational algebra. We prove soundness and completeness of our method, discuss the compatibility of the restrictive assumptions we need w.r.t. our reference application scenarios, and report the results of a preliminary set of experiments to prove the practical applicability of our approach.
Keywords :
recursive functions; relational algebra; description logics; policy comparison; policy languages; policy validation; policy-aware service selection; query optimization; recursive rules; relational algebra; rule-based policy; Algebra; Arithmetic; Authorization; Automata; Conferences; Logic functions; Network servers; Privacy; Query processing; Security; Datalog query containment; Policy comparison; Policy compliance; Policy verification; Policy-aware service selection; Rule-based policies;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2008. POLICY 2008. IEEE Workshop on
Conference_Location :
Palisades, NY
Print_ISBN :
978-0-7695-3133-5
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/POLICY.2008.16
Filename :
4556573
Link To Document :
بازگشت