Definability on a random 3-CNF formula

We consider the question of certifying unsatisfiability of random 3-CNF formulas. At which densities can we hope for a simple sufficient condition for unsatisfiability that holds almost surely? We study this question from the point of view of definability theory. The main result is that first-order logic cannot express any sufficient condition that holds almost surely on random 3-CNF formulas with n^2-α clauses, for any irrational positive number α. In contrast, it can when the number of clauses is n^2+α, for any positive α. As an intermediate step, our proof exploits the planted distribution for 3-CNF formulas in a new technical way. Moreover, the proof requires us to extend the methods of Shelah and Spencer for proving the zero-one law for sparse random graphs to arbitrary relational languages.